Episode 20 - UNTRUSTWORTHY “TRUST”: DOMINATION, FEAR, AND FEARLESSNESS

On 18 April 2026 • Duration 1:01:01

Powered by RedCircle

Today we deep dive into the legal and philosophical foundations of the "federal Indian law trust doctrine." We argue that the term "trust" is a euphemism for a relationship of domination rather than a protective legal obligation.

SHOW NOTES

Today we focus on the so-called “trust doctrine”, the alleged “responsibility” of the US government to “protect” Native Peoples, which is cited over and over as a Native rights mantra.

In the course of our conversation, we connect three dots:

• A January 2026 document filed by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe in opposition to the US Army Corps of Engineers Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Dakota Access Pipeline; the document relies heavily on the assertion of: “a well-established trust responsibility to federally recognized Tribal Nations… that requires federal agencies to protect Tribal lands, natural resources, treaty rights, and cultural interests and to act with heightened care when federal actions threaten those interests.”

• The 2011 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation, 564 U.S. 162, which declares that: “the trust is a sovereign function subject to the plenary authority of Congress, …plenary authority to divest the tribes of any attributes of sovereignty . . . plenary authority to legislate for the Indian tribes in all matters, including their form of government . . . plenary authority over the Indians and all their tribal relations, and full power to legislate concerning their tribal property.”

• The 1831 Supreme Court decision in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. 1, which originated the “trust” doctrine when it declared that Native Nations were not independent, nations, saying: Their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian.

As we explore these materials, we ask why Native litigants persist in raising a losing argument based on a concept that gives the US government total power over Native Peoples and lands.

We suggest that the answer is mental habits rooted in the dominant narrative of the US claim of right of domination. We point out that domination works by instilling pain and fear in the dominated. We offer a way of moving from fear to fearlessness.

Speakers and Merits

The podcast is hosted by two experts with a combined 90 years of experience researching and writing about indigenous issues:

• Peter P. d’Errico: A legal scholar and author of Federal Anti-Indian Law. He brings a background in legal history and critique, specifically focusing on how the American legal system manages "Indian affairs" through a system of domination.

• Steven Newcomb: A researcher and author of Pagans in the Promised Land. He is well-known for his work on the "Doctrine of Discovery" and the historical transition of Native nations from original free existence to a state of claimed domination by the United States.

Conversation Summary

The hosts discuss the "trust doctrine," a concept in federal Indian law that many assume protects tribal interests. However, they argue this is a fundamental misunderstanding.

They point out that in a normal legal trust, the trustee must act for the benefit of the beneficiary. In federal Indian law, however, the Supreme Court has ruled that the "trust" is actually an instrument of federal policy, where the U.S. government (the "trustee") ultimately acts in its own interest.

They use the Standing Rock opposition to the Dakota Access Pipeline as a modern example. They critique the tribe's legal strategy for relying on the "trust responsibility" and U.S. environmental laws rather than standing on their original treaty rights and "free existence".

The hosts suggest that lawyers are "brainwashed" by law school to use specific, polite language (etiquette) that avoids challenging the underlying system of domination. The conversation concludes by exploring how fear—specifically the fear of death, ostracism, or loss of livelihood—is used to maintain obedience to this dominating system.

Important Terms and Concepts

• Trust Doctrine / Trust Responsibility: A legal concept claiming the U.S. has a duty to protect tribes, which the hosts argue is actually a "bare trust" used to exert control.

• Plenary Power: The claimed absolute authority of Congress to legislate over Native nations, including the power to take property or eliminate tribal sovereignty.

• Marshall Trilogy: A series of three 19th-century Supreme Court cases (Johnson v. McIntosh, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, and Worcester v. Georgia) that established the foundations of federal Indian law.

• Domestic Dependent Nations: The specific status Chief Justice Marshall assigned to Native nations, likening them to a "ward to his guardian" rather than independent foreign nations.

• Hickory Nation Case (2011): A Supreme Court case where Justice Alito clarified that the "Indian trust" is a sovereign function of the U.S. government, not a private law trust.

• Original Free Existence: The state of Native nations prior to the invasion and the claim of a "right of domination" by colonizing powers.

• Pattern Interrupt: The act of breaking habitual ways of thinking or behaving, such as filing a lawsuit based on treaty rights instead of standard environmental law.

• Habit of Obedience: A psychological state where people follow the law or social norms out of ingrained conditioning or fear of consequences.

Resources:

• Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Comments in Opposition to the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Dakota Access Pipeline (January 2026): https://mcusercontent.com/219a2239564e69b3f7671537b/files/a8f86f6a-2dc7-9d71-34da-a8f142a4749a/SRST_FEIS_Response_Letter_1.20.2026.pdf

• United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation, 564 U.S. 162 (2011): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/564/162/

• Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. 1 (1831): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/30/1/

• United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206 (1983): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/463/206/

• Arizona v. Navajo Nation, 599 U.S. ___ (2023): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/599/21-1484/

Transcript

Download an AI Generated Transcript of this conversation

Citation

Steve Newcomb and Peter d’Errico, "Episode 20 - UNTRUSTWORTHY “TRUST”: DOMINATION, FEAR, AND FEARLESSNESS," Domination Chronicles (Podcast), 2026-04-05, https://dominationchronicles.com/e020-unworthy-trust-domination-fear-and-fearlesness.

Interlinks

Be sure to visit these other great resources on this and other important cultural subjects!

• Mapping the Doctrine of Discovery - https://podcast.doctrineofdiscovery.org/

• Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory - https://jcrt.org/archives/23.1/

Citation Downloads

• Download RIS Citation
• Download CSL JSON Citation